Germany’s top civil court today has actually ruled against Apple in a case relating to the company’s swipe-to-unlock input approach. Judges in the case described that swipe-to-unlock is not advanced enough to be granted patent security. This ruling falls in line with a comparable judgment that favored Motorola back in 2013 (by means of Bloomberg).
Swipe-to-unlock was not a creation by Apple, the court declares, seeing that it was already suggested by “the state of the art.” The court composed the following:
“This easy to use display screen was already suggested by the cutting-edge. The contested patent thus isn’t based on a creation.”
In 2012, Apple had the ability to secure an injunction in Germany against Motorola on the grounds that its usage of the Android unlock approach violated its swipe-to-unlock patent. This case is still pending on appeal, however with today’s ruling, it needs to now progress forward in favor of Motorola.
Apple’s swipe-to-unlock patent has been the backbone of many of its legal fights with Android manufacturers. Samsung, Apple’s notorious legal opponent, was condemned of borrowing on the patent in May of 2014. That judgment has because been the topic of a fair bit of criticism, with numerous claiming that Apple did not suffer “irreversible harm” from Samsung’s usage of the swipe-to-unlock input technique.
With today’s Germany judgment, more doubt will likely be cast on the validity of Apple’s slide-to-unlock patent. However what effect that doubt will have on the legal cases remains to be seen.Filed under
: AAPL Business Tagged: Apple, iPhone, legal, Motorola
See 9to5Mac to find more special coverage of AAPL Company, Apple, and iPhone.What do you believe?
Talk about “German court says ‘ swipe-to-unlock’not sophisticated adequate to be granted patent defense “with our community. [source]